“I distinctly heard him say ‘Jew’. He said, ‘Jew want something to eat?’ He said ‘Jew’!”

I was watching the news on Thursday night, and they reported that it would cost around US$400 to move an entire Lebanese family by taxi from Tyre, which has been all but annihilated over the course of the past three days, to Beirut, which is considerably safer.

Four hundred bucks -- that's about £215 -- to save an entire family from Israel's unjust, untargeted, non-specific bombing raids. Now, I appreciate this is not our problem to pay for, and furthermore I appreciate that there's a heck of a lot of families to move, each one costing $400, but all I could think was ...

In the scheme of things, $400 is fuck-all. And I know charity begins at home, but where are those Hollywood altruists now? You know, the ones who were all over Hurricane Katrina. Is it controversial to suggest that they are all in the pockets of Jews? They wouldn't want to rock the boat and find that the Weinsteins et al don't want to share a Hollywood table with them anymore, maybe...


[Note: This post is not intended to be read as anti-Semitic. It is simply a presentation of a potential, and wholly feasible, scenario. Everybody knows that Hollywood is largely controlled by Jewish money; while this does not necessarily mean that Hollywood supports the current Israeli action, it could be argued that non-Jewish players would not want to be seen to support Lebanon's cause.]